The AP study pans stimulus but they think more is better?!?

The AP undertook an analysis of the stimulus spending on roads and bridges and finds that "Spend a lot or spend nothing at all, it didn't matter....local unemployment rates rose and fell regardless of how much stimulus money Washington poured our for transportation, raising questions about Obama's argument that more road money would address an "urgent need to accelerate job growth."

However, in a total reversal, the second part of the article details why more stimulus would be a good thing. "A growing body of economic evidence suggest that government programs, including Obama's $700 billion bank bailout program and his $787 billion stimulus, have helped ease the recession."

Can you say conflicted?!? Their data tells them one thing but their delusional belief in Hope and Change leads them to the complete opposite conclusion. Typical.


Popular posts from this blog

October retail sales come in strong, especially auto sales

Tea Party Buffalo Pictures

How to spot a fake Tea Partier