Full Timeline of Goldman Suit: Barack Obama emails to support regulations 28 minutes after NYT breaks lawsuit
A couple of highlights:
NY Times found out about the lawsuit almost immediately after the SEC made the announcement, The New York Times had a 1,200+ word article cued up and online.
Obama emails to support regulations 28 minutes after SEC/NYT breaks the story of the lawsuit.
Bloomberg reported shortly thereafter about the white house reaction.
When someone suggested to Larry Summers (White House Economic Adviser) the news would make it more difficult for banks to lobby against financial-regulatory legislation. Summers simply smiled.
Friday, April 16
The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Goldman, Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors. [kick off]
POLITICO’s Marty Kady questions the timing of the SEC’s charges [Twitter]
Convenient timing: Huge SEC charges against Goldman land week before Senate takes up Wall St reform bill.
At 10:38 a.m. The New York Times breaks the news of the SEC’s charges.
The New York Times: SEC Sues Goldman Over Housing Market Deal
28 minutes later after the The New York Times broke the news, Organizing for America, a project of the Democratic National Committee, emailed millions of people an email from President Obama asking for their help passing financial reform.
FROM: Barack Obama
DATE: Friday, April 16, 2010, 11:07 AM
SUBJECT: Wall Street Reform
With so much at stake, it is not surprising that allies of the big banks and Wall Street lenders have already launched a multi-million-dollar ad campaign to fight these changes. Arm-twisting lobbyists are already storming Capitol Hill, seeking to undermine the strong bipartisan foundation of reform with loopholes and exemptions for the most egregious abusers of consumers.
I won’t accept anything short of the full protection that our citizens deserve and our economy needs. It’s a fight worth having, and it is a fight we can win — if we stand up and speak out together.
So I’m asking you to join me, starting today, by adding your name as a strong supporter of Wall Street
President Barack Obama
NY Times got the scoop: Almost immediately, The New York Times had a 1,200+ word article cued up and online.
We’re still on Friday …
The Hill’s Alexander Bolton sets the stage.
The Hill: Goldman Sachs charged with fraud, setting stage for fiery reform debate
The charges against the prominent Wall Street bank set the stage for debate over financial regulatory reform that is expected to begin in the Senate next week.
House Republican Leader John Boehner’s press office pointed out that Goldman was Obama’s top Wall Street contributor during the 2008 election cycle
Goldman Sachs was President Obama’s top Wall Street contributor during the 2008 election cycle, donating nearly $1 million to his campaign.
At 2:17 p.m. Bloomberg News reporter Mike Dorning notes the reaction of White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers after he was informed of the SEC’s action.
Bloomberg News: Summers Says Financial Overhaul Likely to Be Passed by June
Minutes after the interview ended, as Summers walked down a hallway, an aide informed him that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. had just been sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission for fraud in connection with a financial product tied to subprime mortgages.
Someone suggested the news would make it more difficult for banks to lobby against financial-regulatory legislation. Summers simply smiled.
At 3:38 p.m. POLITICO’s Eamon Javers says the SEC’s charges were unexpected:
President Barack Obama’s push for financial regulatory reform got an unexpected boost from the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday, as the Wall Street regulator charged Goldman, Sachs & Co and a vice president of the investment bank with defrauding investors.
Javers also mentions that President Obama had previously scheduled a meeting of his economic advisers:
Speaking at a previously scheduled meeting of economic advisers Friday, Obama pressed for passage of the measure. “It’s time that we demanded accountability from Wall Street and protection of consumers,” he said. “Every member of Congress has to make a decision — are they going to side with the special interests and the status quo or are they going to side with the American people?”
The New York Post observed that Wall Street was a little suspicious of the SEC’s charges.
Wall Street is more than a little suspicious of today’s charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has accused Goldman Sachs of lying to investors about who was really behind junk mortgages securities it sold to clients.
By Friday’s closing, Goldman Sach’s stock price dropped 23.57 points (12.79%)
Saturday, April 17
POLITICO’s Mike Allen scoops that the Democratic National Committee had Google Word Ads for “Goldman Sachs SEC” working by 4 pm on Friday. The link takes readers to a DNC ad in support of Obama’s Wall Street Reform [screengrab]. When did the DNC purchase the Google ad?
POLITICO: Goldman is Democrats’ new target
When you type “Goldman Sachs SEC” into Google, the results include an ad for Wall Street reform, paid for by the Democratic National Committee.
With the White House amping up its push for tighter regulations of banks, a financial-services industry lobbyist called the ad buy “the Chicagoland equivalent of a horse head in your bed.”
Under the Google AdWords program, advertisers can bid to have a message displayed next to the search results for specific queries, then pay based on the number of times the ad is clicked.
“Fight Wall Street Greed: Help Pres. Obama Reform Wall Street and Create Jobs. Families First!” says the DNC ad.
Was there any collusion between the SEC and the Democratic Party?
Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the top Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government, said in an e-mail: “It must be nice for the Democrats that the SEC’s filing against Goldman Sachs so conveniently fits into their political agenda. But at the end of the day, all the theatrics and tactics in the world will not successfully divert the American people’s attention away from the inescapable fact that the very people the Democrats are trying to blame for main street’s problems are the same people that they gave a blank check to when they bailed them out with hundreds of billions of taxpayers’ dollars.”
Mike Allen included a Barclays Capital analyst report from Friday that also questioned the timing:
Barclays Capital analysts wrote in a research report Friday: “Today’s SEC announcement and conference call (which did not allow analysts or investors to ask questions) was a well-timed, and perhaps not coincidental, effort to sway some on-the-fence Republicans to support a tougher financials bill that the White House has been lobbying for. Targeting GS, given the flurry of anti-Wall Street press hat has centered around that firm offers the publicity that the administration needs at this critical juncture.”
More Saturday news (does Chris Frates work every weekend?):
POLITICO: Banks will accept new consumer agency
President Obama stayed on the attack.
Sunday, April 18
The DNC web team worked all weekend.
When you search Patrick O’Connor’s latest article on the SEC lawsuit, the Google key word ads take you directly to:
Help Change Wall Street: www.BarackObama.com It’s Time for Financial Reform that Protects Main Street. Act Now!
O’Connors work ties together the SEC’s lawsuit and the DNC’s online advertising campaign:
The ad coincides with the Securities and Exchange Commission lawsuit filed April 16 against Goldman Sachs and a company executive. The civil suit became public as the election- year fight over financial regulatory reform intensifies.
And the campaign is off:
Officials said Sunday that the president plans to embark on a series of outside-the-Beltway rallies and town hall events where he will press for financial regulatory reform and turn up the heat on Senate Republicans — reprising the administration’s game plan from the health care debate.
We’ve got a long week ahead of us.
Monday, April 19
Don’t call it a comeback.
Politico: Spitzer: Goldman suit no coincidence
“This was not a coincidence,” asserted the former Democratic governor, who resigned after an affair with a prostitute became public. “There are no coincidences in this world. None.”
“It could be both a witch hunt and legitimate exercise of regulatory authority,” he added.
Wait, does that mean that Rush Limbaugh and Eliot Spitzer agree on something?
Jon Ward monitored the Robert Gibbs swat down on the collusion rumors.
Daily Caller: White House says Goldman Sachs suit not politically motivated, but definitely helpful
“The SEC is, by law, an independent agency. What it does it does not coordinate with the White House and we received no advance notice of any enforcement action,” Gibbs said.
Yet Gibbs also said the suit, which accused Goldman of deceiving investors about a financial instrument, is “a prescient reminder of what’s at stake.”
When asked whether the White House approves of the Democratic National Committee buying ads online to capitalize on the Goldman case, Gibbs declined to comment.
Meanwhile, Dodd’s financial reform bill is still progressing in the Senate.
HuffPost Hill: EXCLUSIVE: GAPS IN DODD BILL
Banks are combing Chris Dodd’s Wall Street reform bill looking for holes they drive their clients through. One K Streeter sends HuffPost’s Arthur Delaney over five pages worth that they’ve identified. If you’re designated as a Farm Credit System, say, you’re exempt from systemic risk regulation, don’t have to keep skin in the game when selling securitized bundles of garbage and won’t be overseen by the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. That and other cleverness here: http://bit.ly/9RRHqX
“Obtaining a carveout isn’t rocket science,” a Republican financial services lobbyist tells HuffPost Hill. “Just give Chairman Dodd and Chuck Schumer a shitload of money.”
And Matt Drudge never misses a chance to match up a headline with an interesting wire photo.
That was Monday. The jury is still out on the DNC’s ad buy timing.
The White House denies any collusion with the SEC’s lawsuit.
And Goldman’s earnings are out Tuesday.
Tuesday, April 20
Things are heating up.
Embattled Goldman Sachs (GS) said Tuesday that thanks to its trading and investing prowess, its first-quarter profit doubled to $3.5 billion, easily beating analysts’ expectations.
Matt Drudge is still dialed in.
“Stop, step away from the collusion”
Republicans sent a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday suggesting the agency’s civil lawsuit against financial giant Goldman Sachs has created “serious questions” about the SEC’s “independence and impartiality.”
In a letter penned to the SEC on Tuesday, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and eight others wondered whether politics have “unduly influenced” the decision to file the complaint, which comes as Senate Democrats push this week for a vote on a major overhaul of financial regulations.
New York Magazine: Wait: Might the SEC Have Had Some Ulterior Motive in Suing Goldman?
Now that the initial excitement has died down a little bit and a closer look at the SEC’s complaint against Goldman Sachs has been taken, some have started wondering about the party on the other side of this transaction. Other than the pursuit of justice for all the little people, what motives might the SEC have had in filing a big, public lawsuit against Goldman Sachs?
Zachary Goldfarb drives the markets.
For months, Goldman Sachs and the Securities and Exchange Commission had been involved in secret talks over allegations that the Wall Street bank defrauded customers in selling them investments designed to fail.Then, after a crucial meeting last month between lawyers for Goldman and the SEC, the agency came to a fork in the road. Even after SEC lawyers had told Goldman in writing they were prepared to file a federal suit, the firm gave no ground, declining to ask for a settlement, according to three people familiar with the case. The agency could prolong negotiations in hopes of reaching a deal Goldman would accept, as the SEC had often done in previous cases, or take the bank to court.Endorsing the recommendation of investigators, the SEC’s five-member commission voted 3 to 2 to proceed with the civil suit, taking a high-stakes gamble that pits Wall Street’s top regulator against its most storied bank. The case, filed Friday, has provoked a counteroffensive from Goldman, which says it was blindsided by the suit. Goldman’s defenders are suggesting that the suit may have been designed to help make the case for the Obama administration’s push this month for legislation to overhaul financial regulation.